Journalists record the world’s tragedies, but who records their pain?
Disasters produce journalists who quickly reach the affected areas. First responders and journalists enter dangerous situations to document destruction while they take images of losses and provide emotional testimony about war and crisis-related catastrophes. Their mission requires non-interference, yet they experience the heavy emotional weight of their news coverage. Journalists who work as freelancers and hold entry-level positions encounter the same traumatic exposure that military personnel and healthcare workers experience, but lack any institutional support system. The professional assignment lacks required rest periods, trauma briefings, and support during its completion. Workers must remain neutral while displaying strength before moving forward in their duties.
Newsroom employees have traditionally maintained emotional control as their cultural standard, while many consider it an expression of pride. Psychological damage from their work experiences manifests among journalists in their private lives. Studies demonstrate that war correspondents develop PTSD at the same rate as combat veterans, which reaches up to 28%. The traumatic experiences journalists face occur in every type of news reporting. Journalists who report on refugee emergencies and mass violence, and natural disasters, along with human suffering, often experience prolonged psychological effects from their work. The damage is usually cumulative. The current system fails to recognize these issues as a critical concern.
A silent crisis behind the byline
Journalistic external risks, such as dangerous environments, physical threats, and political oppression, have clear visibility, but the internal emotional state of journalists remains poorly understood. Most psychological distress in journalists gets managed through either avoiding discussion of their emotions, separating personal feelings from their work, or suppressing their mental health issues. The instant survival mechanisms journalists use to cope with situations end up causing long-term problems that result in emotional detachment and burnout. Newsroom environments that promote these responses remain unchecked because journalists face the challenge of being vulnerable without organizational support. Emotional control operates as an individual matter within this context. You must find a way to manage your emotions by any means possible or develop the ability to fake emotional stability.
Research demonstrates that long-term emotional repression, which proves beneficial for meeting deadlines, creates future health hazards. My research shows journalists use these coping strategies because they have no other alternatives. The habit of dealing with traumatic experiences through avoidance of psychological evaluation affects personal health as well as storytelling quality and professional sustainability.
What the Observer Study found
My research initiative, The Observer Study, investigated both exposure to trauma and how journalists emotionally process their experiences. A seven-day diary research involved twelve working journalists who documented their most challenging daily encounters.
The participants used the PCL-5 assessment for PTSD before and after the research period. I wanted to determine if daily narrative engagement quantities through written words could indicate emotional processing changes concerning symptom severity.
The study produced results that both revealed unexpected findings and contradicted standard expectations. The participants who wrote more detailed entries showed greater PTSD symptoms after the study, despite their extensive documentation. The statistical association between these two variables was minor but maintained consistency across different analysis models. The study produced unexpected findings contradicting the common belief that writing about emotions leads to healing. The data indicated that increased word count does not necessarily improve recovery. Excessive verbalization about traumatic events sometimes indicates persistent rumination that keeps individuals stuck in cycles of unproductive emotional thought. Very short entries in the study stated avoidance, which remains a documented barrier to recovery. Both cases show that the fundamental issue stems from poor emotional regulation rather than the extent of engagement.
When coping backfires
Emotion regulation is a skill that people learn to identify the right strategies to employ at appropriate times. Theoretical models of regulatory flexibility emphasize this nuance. People with the most resilience can adapt their coping strategies to changing situations. Journalists experience multiple work environments throughout their shifts as they interview grieving families in the morning, compose factual articles by afternoon, and attend press events in the evening. The situation requires different emotional approaches because no single stance can work across all circumstances. Many journalists use only suppression as their coping mechanism because their institutions have not provided training or recognition for alternative coping methods.
Study participants showed different patterns of engagement with traumatic material as they seemed to become trapped in continuous overprocessing cycles. The participants showed limited emotional involvement because they used avoidance mechanisms as defensive measures. Both extreme cases have proven to cause negative mental health consequences in previous research studies. The level of safety depends on the approach taken between keeping silent and sharing excessive information. The crucial factor is adaptability because it allows people to modify their emotional displays according to the situation and its significance.
The cost of organizational neglect
Institutional neglect was a recurring theme in the data. Participants rated their organizations at a level of two out of five regarding their perceived employer support. Most employees have never received mental health training, while also lacking formal psychological support. Some participants obtained therapy outside their workplace, while others managed independently without help or through social networks. The participants reported occasional peer support but lacked an organized system for handling emotional distress.
This lack of structure is not merely unfortunate — it’s dangerous. News organizations fail to provide journalists with protective frameworks to help them handle work-related psychological burdens since they neglect to recognize emotional labor. Long-term exposure to this situation damages both personal health and the long-term viability of journalism as a profession. Systems requiring emotional investment from professionals produce predictable negative results, including burnout, moral injury, and psychological detachment.
What needs to change
Implementing emotional regulation needs to become a standard part of professional journalism practice. Newsrooms should start by teaching their staff coping strategies and creating environments that promote help-seeking behaviors and establish peer support systems. The early findings from Norway and the UK’s institutional experiments regarding such models indicate promise for success. Training journalists to identify their emotional patterns, including avoidance, over-engagement, and inflexibility, will give them both survival tools and the ability to execute their assignments better while maintaining clarity, compassion, and extended work duration.
The Observer Study proposes that using expressive behavior measures like daily reflection word counts could be an unobtrusive indicator of psychological distress. The research method needs further development through qualitative analysis and expanded participant numbers, but the potential outcomes appear favorable. Research shows that we can identify distress at its early stages through new methods to provide personalized interventions that prevent deepening suffering.
A call to action
The world’s most sorrowful events become observable through journalists who witness them. Through their reporting, journalists record war, suffering, and injustice to help readers comprehend these realities. Through their storytelling duties, journalists make themselves vulnerable to each narrative’s emotional leftovers. Our minimum responsibility should be to understand that journalists face emotional costs while performing their work, since ignoring them complicates their suffering.
The Observer Study does not claim to offer a final answer. The research serves as a starting point that reveals how trauma infiltrates the work of journalism professionals. The research shows that journalists’ psychological outcomes significantly depend on their approach to work, including their written content, disclosed and concealed information, and methods for processing disturbing topics. Creating a sustainable press corps that maintains bravery requires public acknowledgment of emotional health as an essential professional duty.
S. Emre Kuraner is a clinical psychologist and researcher specializing in trauma, emotion regulation, and digital media. He recently completed his M.A. at Teachers College, Columbia University
About The Author
